MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TENDENCY TOWARD COSMETIC SURGERY: EXAMINING THE ROLE OF BIOLOGICAL, PSYCHODYNAMIC, AND ATTRIBUTIONAL MODELS WITH EMPHASIS ON GENDER DIFFERENCES AND BODY DYSMORPHIC DISORDER
PDF (English)

Ключевые слова

Cosmetic Surgery, Bio-Psychological Models, Gender Differences, Body Dysmorphic Disorder, Socio-Cultural Factors.

Аннотация

This research undertakes a multidimensional analysis of the tendency toward cosmetic surgery, investigating the roles of biological, psychodynamic, and attributional models. Emphasizing gender differences, this study explores how various factors influence individuals’ decisions regarding cosmetic surgery. Furthermore, the relationship between this tendency and Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) is assessed. The findings of this research can contribute to a deeper understanding of the psychological and social complexities behind cosmetic surgeries and provide guidance for mental health professionals and surgeons. This study aims to answer the following research questions using a correlational research method of regression type: 1- How do biological, psychodynamic, and attributional models explain the tendency toward cosmetic surgery in individuals with gender differences? 2- Is there a significant relationship between the severity of Body Dysmorphic Disorder and the tendency toward cosmetic surgery?

The findings indicate that biological, psychodynamic, and attributional models significantly predict the tendency toward cosmetic surgery in both women and men, and these effects differ between the sexes. Body Dysmorphic Disorder has a significant positive relationship with the tendency toward cosmetic surgery.

PDF (English)

Библиографические ссылки

Stewart, D. E., & Vigod, S. (2016). Postpartum depression. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(22), 2177-2186.‏

Flint, J., & Kendler, K. S. (2014). The genetics of major depression. Neuron, 81(3), 484-503.‏

Phillips KA, Menard W. (2006). Suicidality in body dysmorphic disorder: a prospective study. Am J Psychiatry.

Kessler, R. C., & Bromet, E. J. (2013). The epidemiology of depression across cultures. Annual review of public health, 34, 119-138.

Hubley, A. M. (2014). Beck depression inventory. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 338-345.‏

Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2015). Perpetrators and targets of bullying at work: Role stress and individual differences. Perspectives on Bullying: Research on Childhood, Workplace, and Cyberbullying, 22(6), 135.

Foster, J. A., & Neufeld, K. A. M. (2013). Gut–brain axis: how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends in neurosciences, 36(5), 305-312.‏

Fried, E. I., & Nesse, R. M. (2015). Depression sum-scores don’t add up: why analyzing specific depression symptoms is essential. BMC medicine, 13(1), 72.‏

Chisholm D, Sweeny K, Sheehan P, Rasmussen B, Smit F, Cuijpers P, et al. Scaling-up treatment of depression and anxiety: a global return on investment analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(5):415–24. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30024-4.

Yirmiya, R., Rimmerman, N., & Reshef, R. (2015). Depression as a microglial disease. Trends in neurosciences, 38(10), 637-658.‏

Gong, L., Li, W., Zhang, D., & Rost, DH. (2015). Effect of emotionregulation strategies on anxiety during job interview in chinese college students. Anxiety Stress Coping, 1-17.