Ключевые слова
Аннотация
Mazkur ilmiy maqolada kimyo fanini o‘qitishda bo‘lajak kimyo fani o‘qituvchilarining kasbiy kompetentligini baholash mezonlarini ishlab chiqishning nazariy-metodologik asoslari yoritilgan. Tadqiqotda kompetensiyaviy yondashuvning mazmun-mohiyati ochib berilib, bo‘lajak o‘qituvchilarning kasbiy kompetentligi kognitiv, operatsion-amaliy, kommunikativ va refleksiv komponentlar asosida tizimli tahlil qilinadi. Shuningdek, har bir komponent bo‘yicha aniq baholash indikatorlari ishlab chiqilib, kompetentlik darajasini aniqlashning uch bosqichli (yuqori, o‘rta, past) mezonlari asoslab berilgan.
Maqolada zamonaviy pedagogik texnologiyalar, interfaol metodlar va raqamli vositalarning kimyo ta’limidagi o‘rni tahlil qilinib, ularning bo‘lajak o‘qituvchilar kompetentligini rivojlantirishdagi ahamiyati ochib berilgan. Tajriba-sinov ishlari natijalari asosida taklif etilgan baholash mezonlarining samaradorligi isbotlangan hamda ularni oliy ta’lim amaliyotiga joriy etish bo‘yicha ilmiy-amaliy tavsiyalar ishlab chiqilgan. Tadqiqot natijalari kimyo fani o‘qituvchilarini tayyorlash sifatini oshirish, ta’lim jarayonini takomillashtirish va raqobatbardosh pedagog kadrlarni shakllantirishga xizmat qiladi.
Библиографические ссылки
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher Education Around the World: What Can We Learn from International Practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309.
Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
European Commission. (2013). Supporting Teacher Competence Development for Better Learning Outcomes. Brussels: European Union.
OECD. (2019). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) Results. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Biggs, J., Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. New York: Longman.
Black, P., Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
Bybee, R.W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Arlington: NSTA Press.
Gilbert, J.K., Treagust, D.F. (2009). Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Johnstone, A.H. (1991). Why is Science Difficult to Learn? Things are Seldom What They Seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83.
Taber, K.S. (2013). Modelling Learners and Learning in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasi. (2020). Ta’lim tizimini rivojlantirish bo‘yicha qarorlar to‘plami. Toshkent.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy va o‘rta maxsus ta’lim vazirligi. (2021). Oliy ta’lim davlat ta’lim standartlari. Toshkent.
Xodjayev, B.X. (2018). Pedagogika nazariyasi va amaliyoti. Toshkent: Fan va texnologiya.
Tolipov, O‘.Q., Usmonboyeva, M. (2017). Pedagogik texnologiyalar va pedagogik mahorat. Toshkent: Iqtisod-Moliya.
Yo‘ldoshev, J.G., Usmonov, S.A. (2019). Zamonaviy pedagogik texnologiyalar. Toshkent: O‘qituvchi.
Azizxodjayeva, N.N. (2016). Pedagogik texnologiyalar va pedagogik mahorat asoslari. Toshkent.
Ismoilov, A. (2022). Kimyo ta’limida innovatsion yondashuvlar va ularning samaradorligi. Pedagogik mahorat, 3(2), 45–52.