Keywords
Abstract
Ushbu maqolada laminoplastika usulining tarixiy rivojlanishi, klassik variantlari, amaliy texnologik yondashuvlari, afzallik va kamchiliklari, shuningdek, dunyo bo‘yicha qo‘llanilishi va statistik samaradorligi haqida tibbiy va ilmiy manbalar asosida tahliliy ma’lumotlar keltirilgan. Laminoplastika zamonaviy neyroxirurgiyada harakatni saqlovchi dekompressiv usul sifatida katta klinik ahamiyatga ega.
References
Hirabayashi, K., Miyakawa, J., Satomi, K., Maruyama, T., & Wakano, K. (1983). Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198301000-00001
Epstein, N. E. (2002). Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: Review of recent studies. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 15(5), 389–393. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200210000-00001
Ratliff, J. K., & Cooper, P. R. (2003). Cervical laminoplasty: A critical review. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 98(3), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2003.98.3.0230
Kurokawa, T., Tsuyama, N., Tanaka, H., & Hoshino, Y. (1982). Enlargement of the spinal canal by the sagittal splitting of the spinous process. Spine Surgery, 7(2), 173–180.
Seichi, A., Takeshita, K., Ohishi, I., & Matsunaga, S. (2001). Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. Spine, 26(5), 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200103010-00011
Chiba, K., Ogawa, Y., Ishii, K., Takaishi, H., & Matsumoto, M. (2006). Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy–average 14-year follow-up study. Spine, 31(26), 2998–3005. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000250083.09286.d5
Machino, M., Yukawa, Y., Ito, K., Nakashima, H., Kato, F. (2012). Cervical laminoplasty: A review of surgical indications, techniques, and outcomes. Spine Surgery and Related Research, 2(1), 1–10