Keywords
Abstract
Ushbu maqolada professional sport sohasida, xususan professional futbol va individual sport turlarida keng qo‘llaniladigan murabbiylik shartnomasining huquqiy tabiati tahlil etiladi. Tadqiqot murabbiylik shartnomasini sof mehnat huquqi yoki sof fuqarolik-huquqiy konstruksiya sifatida malakalashning nazariy va amaliy cheklovlarini ko‘rsatib beradi. “Subordinatsiya paradoksi”, sa’y-harakat va natija majburiyatlarining gibrid birlashuvi, intellektual mulk hamda fiduciar elementlarning mavjudligi asosida murabbiylik shartnomasi aralash huquqiy bitim sifatida e’tirof etilishi lozimligi asoslanadi. Natijalar professional sport huquqi va shartnoma huquqi doktrinasi uchun amaliy ahamiyat kasb etadi.
References
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Mehnat kodeksi. — Toshkent: Adolat, 1996. https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-6257288
Bundesarbeitsgericht (BAG), Urteil vom 19.11.2003 — Az. 5 AZR 21/03. Germaniya Federal Mehnat Sudi qarorlari to‘plami. Germaniya Fuqarolik Kodeksi (BGB), 611a-paragraf. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/
Rossiya Federatsiyasi Mehnat kodeksi. 55-bob: Sportchilar va murabbiylar mehnati. — Moskva, 2001. https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/rus_e/wtaccrus58_leg_363.pdf
Savatier, R. (1934). Traité de la responsabilité civile en droit français. — Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence. https://www.persee.fr/doc/ridc_0035-3337_1950_num_2_4_19130
Finn, P. D. (1977). Fiduciary Obligations. — Sydney: Law Book Co. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1095693
Employment Rights Act 1996. — London: HMSO, 1996. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/contents
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik kodeksi. 354-modda: Aralash shartnoma. 631-modda: Pudrat shartnomasi. 1035-modda: Litsenziya shartnomasi. — Toshkent: Adolat, 1997. https://lex.uz/mact/-111189
CAS upheld appeal of Slavoljub Muslin against Amkar Perm // SILA International Lawyers (Case summary). URL: https://silalawyers.com/cas-upheld-appeal-of-slavoljub-muslin-against-amkar-perm/