Ключевые слова
Аннотация
Zamonaviy ikki tomonlama investitsiya bitimlarida xorijiy investorlarning kamsitilmasligini ta’minlash maqsadida eng ko‘p qulaylik rejimi (MFN) tamoyilidan keng foydalaniladi. Biroq, eng ko‘p qulaylik rejimi tamoyili arbitraj amaliyotida qo‘llash, birinchi navbatda, uchinchi bitimlardan nizolarning yanada qulay shartlarini "import qilish" imkoniyati bilan bog‘liq nizolarni keltirib chiqaradi.
Masalan, Maffezini v. Ispaniya (2000) investorga arbitrajda uchinchi davlat bilan kelishuvning qulayroq qoidalarini qo‘llashga ruxsat berdi.
Lekin, bunga teskari ravishda, Plama v. Bolgariya (2005) va boshqa arbitrajlar sudlovni kengaytirish uchun tomonlarning aniq roziligini shart qilib qo‘ydilar. Ushbu maqolada eng ko‘p qulaylik rejimi tamoyilini qo‘llash nazariyasi va amaliyotining tahliliy sharhi, shu jumladan asosiy arbitraj ishlarini tahlil qilish, shuningdek, ushbu yondashuvlarning huquqni qo‘llash va qonunchilikka ta’siri ko‘rib chiqiladi.
Investorlar va davlatlar manfaatlarini muvozanatlashtirish uchun bu tamoyil qoidalarining amal qilish doirasini kelajakdagi bitimlar va milliy qonunchilikda aniq belgilash zarurligi muhokama qilinadi.
Библиографические ссылки
Global Arbitration Review. (2022). Substantive protections: MFN jurisprudence explained through analysis of treaty language, the claimant’s ambition and choice of arbitrator. In Guide to Investment Treaty Protection and Enforcement (3rd ed.).
Gözlügöl, A. A. (2018). The applicability to dispute settlement of most favored nation clauses in international investment agreements. Cambridge Law Review, 3(1), 174– 189.
Houde, M.-F., & Pagani, F. (2004). Most-Favoured-Nation treatment in international investment law. OECD Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2004/2. Paris: OECD.
Nikièma, S. H. (2017). The most-favoured-nation clause in investment treaties. IISD Best Practices Series, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Smith, K. S. (2024). The jurisdiction-limiting MFN clause. New York University Law Review, 99, 1139–1212.
UNCTAD. (2011). Most-favoured nation treatment. UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II (UNCTAD/DIAE/IA/2010/1).
Bermann, G. A. (2025). Most-favored-nation’s false promises. Arbitration International, 41(3), 441–[460].
Dolzer, R. (2004). After Tecmed: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses in Investment Protection Agreements. ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 19(1), 49– 68.
Andrew Newcombe; Lluís Paradell. Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment. Kluwer Law International, 2009.
Tulyakov Eldor. Bilateral Investment Treaties of Uzbekistan: Investor-State Dispute Resolution. University of Bologna Law Review, 2019 1
The Boundaries of Most-Favoured Nation Treatment in International Investment Law. Tony Cole
MFN-based jurisdiction in investor-state arbitration: is there Any hope for a consistent approach?. Journal of International Economic Law. 2010. Julie A. Maupin