Keywords
Abstract
Ushbu tadqiqot xalqaro investitsiya huquqida kompensatsiya masalalarining nazariy va amaliy asoslarini chuqur tahlil etishga bag‘ishlangan. Global investitsiya oqimlarining ortishi investorlar aktivlarini himoya qilishga doir huquqiy kafolatlar, xususan adolatli va o‘rinli kompensatsiya tamoyilining dolzarbligini oshirmoqda. Tadqiqotda ekspropriatsiyaning to‘g‘ridan-to‘g‘ri va bilvosita shakllari, kompensatsiyani hisoblashning asosiy metodlari, ICSID va boshqa arbitraj institutlari amaliyotidagi qarama-qarshi yondashuvlar qiyosiy o‘rganilgan. Shuningdek, legitim kutishlar mezonining noaniqligi, baholashdagi metodologik tafovutlar, davlatning regulyator vakolatlari va investor manfaatlari o‘rtasidagi muvozanatni ta’minlash kabi muammolar yoritilgan. Tadqiqot yakunida kompensatsiya tizimini takomillashtirish bo‘yicha amaliy takliflar ishlab chiqilgan.
References
Paulsson, J. (2005). Arbitration Without Privity. ICSID Review, 20(1), 1–36.
Reinisch, A. (2008). Standards of Protection in Investment Treaties: Legitimate Expectations, Fair and Equitable Treatment, and Expropriation. Oxford University Press, 45–102.
Fry, L. (2019). Proportionality in International Investment Arbitration. Cambridge University Press, 120–178.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). (1976). UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, 5–22.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). (1965). Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, 10–30.
OECD. (2012). International Investment Law: Understanding Concepts and Tracking Innovations. OECD Publishing, 33–87.
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012). Principles of International Investment Law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, 50–125.
UNCTAD. (2020). World Investment Report 2020: International Production Beyond the Pandemic. United Nations, 15–90.
Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award (2000), para. 76–120.
Philip Morris Brands Sàrl, Philip Morris Products S.A. and Abal Hermanos S.A. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7, Award (2016), para. 110–180.
Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v. The Russian Federation, PCA Case No. AA 227, Award (2009), para. 300–400.
CMS Gas Transmission Company v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award (2005), para. 200–250.