Ключевые слова
Аннотация
This study focuses on the GIS-based assessment of Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI) in Tashkent, aiming to evaluate its spatial distribution, accessibility, and ecological effectiveness in the context of rapid urbanization. The research examines the role of green infrastructure in mitigating environmental challenges such as air pollution, urban heat island effects, and uneven distribution of green spaces. Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technologies, including spatial analysis and remote sensing techniques, the study integrates satellite imagery and vegetation indices such as NDVI to quantify and analyze urban greenery. The findings reveal significant spatial disparities in the distribution of green infrastructure, with central areas having relatively higher green coverage compared to peripheral districts. The study also highlights issues related to fragmentation and limited accessibility of green spaces, which reduce their ecological and social benefits. Based on GIS-based analysis, the research proposes strategic recommendations for improving the planning, connectivity, and sustainability of urban green infrastructure.
Библиографические ссылки
Thomas Elmqvist, Andersson, E., McPhearson, T., Bai, X., Bettencourt, L., Brondizio, E. S., ... & Karen C. Seto (2020). Urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services in rapidly growing cities. Nature Sustainability, 3(10), 781–789.
Dagmar Haase, Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., Artmann, M., Borgström, S., Breuste, J., ... & Kabisch, N. (2021). A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation. Ecological Indicators, 125, 107488.
Timothy Beatley (2022). Biophilic cities and urban green infrastructure: Planning for nature in cities. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 148(2), 04022015.
Matthias Kabisch, Korn, H., Stadler, J., & Bonn, A. (2020). Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: Perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, and future research needs. Ecology and Society, 25(2), 32.
Christopher J. Schell, Dyson, K., Fuentes, T. L., Des Roches, S., Harris, N. C., Miller, D. S., Woelfle-Erskine, C. A., & Lambert, M. R. (2020). The ecological and evolutionary consequences of systemic racism in urban environments. Science, 369(6510), eaay4497.
David N. Barton, Kelemen, E., Dick, J., Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Jacobs, S., Hendriks, K., ... & Potschin-Young, M. (2021). Ecosystem services and nature-based solutions for urban sustainability. Ecosystem Services, 49, 101270.
Zhifeng Yang, Li, Y., Sun, T., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Urban green space ecosystem services and their valuation: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 780, 146642.
Peng Gong, Li, X., Zhang, W., Zhou, Y., & Wang, L. (2022). Mapping global urban green space using satellite data and GIS techniques. Remote Sensing of Environment, 268, 112780.
Thomas Astell-Burt & Xiaoqi Feng (2022). Urban green space, tree canopy and mental health: Evidence from large-scale population studies. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(2), e142–e151.
Nina-Marie L. Kabisch, Frantzeskaki, N., Pauleit, S., Naumann, S., Davis, M., Artmann, M., & Haase, D. (2023). Nature-based solutions and urban green infrastructure in Europe: Advancing sustainable cities. Ambio, 52(1), 1–15.