REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN TPF PRACTICES AT INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION

Abstract

Third-party funding (TPF) has become increasingly prevalent in international arbitration, providing financial backing to parties engaged in disputes. However, the use and regulation of TPF vary significantly across different regions. This article explores these regional differences, analyzing the factors that contribute to them and their impact on the international arbitration landscape.

pdf

References

Clements, S. J. (2016). Third-party funding in international arbitration: A race to the bottom or a necessary evolution? Arbitration International, 32(3), 390-412.

Gaillard, E. (2014). Third-party funding in international arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 31(2), 163-188.

Greenwood, L. (2017). The ethics of third-party funding in international arbitration. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 8(2), 221-242.

Lee, S., & Kim, H. S. (2018). Third-party funding in international arbitration in Asia: A new dawn? Transnational Law & Development, 12(2), 221-246.

Pistor, K. (2006). Legal transplants and transitional economies: Ruta previa or a path to nowhere? European University Institute.