PEACE IN RETRIBUTION AND ITS RULINGS IN HANAFI JURISPRUDENCE
PDF

Keywords

Sulh, Qiṣāṣ, pardon, Hanafi jurisprudence, diya, wali al-dam, Islamic criminal law.

Abstract

Retribution (Qiṣāṣ) constitutes one of the most significant enforcement guarantees within Islamic criminal law, playing a fundamental role in ensuring justice and deterring crimes against the bodily integrity of individuals. Nevertheless, in order to safeguard social interests and to promote the spirit of forgiveness and reconciliation, Islam has introduced the institution of Sulh (amicable settlement) alongside Qiṣāṣ. Within Hanafi jurisprudence, Sulh in the context of Qiṣāṣ Is recognized as a legitimate mechanism for ending disputes and preventing the continuation of hostility, with specific legal provisions governing its application.

Hanafi jurists, relying on Qur’anic verses and Prophetic traditions, consider Sulh in Qiṣāṣ not only permissible but, In certain cases, recommended and commendable; thus, the legal heirs of the victim (wali al-dam) may pardon the offender either In exchange for compensation (diya) or gratuitously. This study examines the concept of Sulh in Qiṣāṣ, analyzing its validity requirements and legal consequences under Hanafi jurisprudence, and demonstrates that this institution can play an effective role in achieving restorative justice and mitigating social harms. Furthermore, a comparative overview of Hanafi perspectives with those of other Islamic schools of law Is presented, thereby highlighting the significance of this subject within the framework of Islamic legal thought.

PDF

References

Qur’an

Al-Bukhari, Muhammad ibn Isma‘il. (1400 AH). Al-Jami‘ al-Sahih. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Hindi, Nizam al-Din. (1991). Al-Fatawa al-Hindiyyah (al-‘Alamgiriyyah). Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Ali, Muhammad Mustafa. (n.d.). Nizam al-Qada’ fi al-Shari‘ah al-Islamiyyah. Riyadh: Maktabat al-Ma‘arif.

Al-Kasani, Ala al-Din Abu Bakr. (1406 AH). Bada’i‘ al-Sana’i‘ fi Tartib al-Shara’i‘, Vol. 7. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Kasani, Ala al-Din. (1986). Bada’i‘ al-Sana’i‘ fi Tartib al-Shara’i‘. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Nawawi, Yahya ibn Sharaf. (1405 AH). Al-Majmu‘ Sharh al-Muhadhdhab, Vol. 26. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Sarakhsi, Muhammad ibn Ahmad. (1421 AH). Al-Mabsut, Vol. 10. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah.

Al-Sarakhsi, Shams al-Din. (1406 AH). Al-Mabsut. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah.

Al-Zuhaili, Wahbah. (1997). Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuh. Damascus: Dar al-Fikr.

Fakhr al-Razi, Muhammad ibn ‘Umar. (1420 AH). Al-Tafsir al-Kabir. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi.

Ibn ‘Abidin, Muhammad Amin. (2000). Radd al-Muhtar ‘ala al-Durr al-Mukhtar. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Ibn Humam, Kamal al-Din. (1317 AH). Fath al-Qadir. Cairo: Dar al-Kutub.

Ibn Manzur, Muhammad ibn Mukarram. (1414 AH). Lisan al-‘Arab. Beirut: Dar Sadir.

Jafari Langarudi, Muhammad Jafar. (2005). Terminology of Law. Tehran: Ganj Danesh.

Javadi Amoli, Abdullah. (2016). Islamic Jurisprudence and Criminal Law. Tehran: Isra Publications.

Najafi, Muhammad Hasan. (1981). Jawahir al-Kalam fi Sharh Shara’i‘ al-Islam, Vol. 43. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi.

Tabataba’I, Sayyid Muhammad Husayn. (1417 AH). Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an. Qom: Islamic Publication Institute.

Yazdani, Muhammad. (2019). “Restorative Justice and Its Place in the Islamic Criminal System.” Islamic Criminal Law Journal, 12(1), 85–102.

Laws

Afghanistan Penal Code, enacted 2017.

Islamic Penal Code of Iran, enacted 2013.