Keywords
Abstract
This study analyzes how the rules of detective stories changed in American books during the middle and end of the 20th century. The main goal is to explain how writers used irony to take apart old detective ideas, like the genius investigator, the simple plot, and the clear ending. Books by famous authors such as Paul Auster and Thomas Pynchon are used as the main examples for this study. The analysis is done by looking closely at the structure of the stories and how they use parody. Standard detective tricks are identified and compared to how they appear in these newer books to see how their meaning has shifted. By comparing these two styles, the research shows a move away from the classic “who did it” stories toward “anti-detective” novels. In these books, searching for the truth feels more like a game with the reader rather than a crime that actually gets solved.
References
Auster, Paul. The New York Trilogy: City of Glass. Penguin Books, 1990. – P.64.
Eco, Umberto. The Name of the Rose. Translated by William Weaver, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1983. – P.74.
Holquist, Michael. "Whodunit and Who Am I? The Detective Story and Metaphysical Allegory." Poetics Today, vol. 3, no. 1, 1982, pp. 135-145.
McHale, Brian. Postmodernist Fiction. Routledge, 1987.
Merivale, Patricia, and Susan Elizabeth Sweeney, editors. Detecting Texts: The Metaphysical Detective Story from Poe to Postmodernism. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999.
Pynchon, Thomas. The Crying of Lot 49. J.B. Lippincott & Co., 1966. – P.28.
Tani, Stefano. The Doomed Detective: The Contribution of the Detective Novel to Postmodern American and Italian Fiction. Southern Illinois University Press, 1984.