COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMAGERY AND THEMES IN SHAKESPEAREAN TRAGEDIES AND ULUGBEK’S WORKS
pdf (English)

Ключевые слова

Comparative Literature, Shakespeare, Ulugbek, Imagery, Archetypes, English Literature, Uzbek Literature, Cross-Cultural Analysis, Tragedy, Themes, Translation Studies.

Аннотация

This article explores the intriguing intersection of literary expression across distinct cultural and linguistic landscapes, specifically examining shared imagery and thematic resonances between William Shakespeare’s tragedies and the works of the Timurid scholar-ruler, Ulugbek. Utilizing a comparative analysis approach, this research investigates how universal archetypal images such as darkness and light, celestial bodies, nature, and the passage of time are employed to convey profound ideas about human existence, morality, and fate within their respective literary traditions. The study reveals that despite notable cultural and linguistic disparities, certain archetypal symbols resonate across both traditions, although their interpretations and contextual significance diverge significantly. Through a close examination of key passages and literary devices, this paper highlights the profound influence of cultural perspectives and explores the nuanced tapestry of human experience mirrored in both the English and Uzbek literary contexts. The article concludes by acknowledging the challenges and rewards of comparative literature and by exploring its contribution to the broader understanding of universal human concerns.

pdf (English)

Библиографические ссылки

Auerbach, N. (2010). The politics of tragedy: The role of power in Shakespeare's works. Shakespeare Studies, 42(3), 130-145.

Bakiev, A. (2015). The cosmology of Ulugbek: Astronomy and the human condition. Journal of Central Asian Studies, 19(2), 110-115.

Jones, B. (2019). Desdemona's Tragic Fate: A Feminist Perspective. Shakespeare Studies, 50(2), 201-218.

Kadirov, M. (2014). Ulugbek and the politics of power: A historical analysis. Central Asian Historical Review, 22(1), 85-95.

Segal, E. (2017). Hamlet's soliloquy and the search for self-identity. Shakespearean Literature Quarterly, 36(4), 125-133.

Ulugbek. (2007). Zij-i-Sultani: Astronomical Tables. Tashkent: Academy of Sciences Press.

Shakespeare, W. (2003). Macbeth. Edited by A. J. Smith. New York: Penguin Classics.

M,Thakur. Shakespearean Tagedy: Themes and Characters”. International journal of Early Childhood Special Education. 2020. P-955

Wilson, R. (2017). The Tragedy of Desdemona: A Reassessment. Journal of Shakespearean Studies, 49(3), 321-338.

Wilson, R. (2015). Othello and the Question of Fate. Shakespearean Inquiry, 39(1), 45-63.

Gadoyeva, M. I., & Kabilova, N. S. (2019). Выражение значения неопределенности числительными, нумеративами и посредством слова "бир" в английском и узбекском языках. Theoretical & Applied Science, (11), 699-704.

Orayeva, D. S., & Gadoyeva, M. I. (2021). Ingliz va o`zbek madaniyati olqishlarida somatizm semantikasi. Science and Education, 2(11), 893-900.

Ibragimovna, G. M. (2022, January). Mehnat va mehnatsevarlik haqidagi ingliz va o’zbek maqollarining semantik tahlili. In Integration Conference on Integration of Pragmalinguistics, Functional Translation Studies and Language Teaching Processes (pp. 311-313).

Ibragimovna, G. M. (2021). Lexico-semantic fields of “eye” in english and Uzbek languages. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(10), 872-879.

Gadoyeva, M. (2022). Comparative analysis of moods in English and Uzbek languages. центр научных публикаций (buxdu. uz), 26(26).

Ibragimovna, G. M., & Sherali, O. (2021). Expression of the meaning of indefiniteness in English and Uzbek languages by the modal means. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(10), 820-824.

Gadoyeva, M. (2021). The expression of the figurative words and phrases in the English, Uzbek and Russian languages. Центр научных публикаций (buxdu. uz), 5(5).

Gadoyeva, M.I. (2021). Somatik leksikaning xususiyatlari. Scientific progress, 2(6), 1749-1754.