DIGITAL PEDAGOGY AND LITERACY DEVELOPMENT: INNOVATIONS IN TEACHING READING AND WRITING
PDF

Keywords

Digital pedagogy, Literacy development, Reading instruction, Writing instruction, Educational technology, 21st-century skills, E-learning tools, Student engagement, Digital literacy, Innovative teaching methods.

Abstract

This article explores innovative methods of teaching reading and writing using digital tools in the 21st-century classroom. It examines how digital pedagogy enhances student engagement, promotes individualized learning, and fosters critical literacy skills. The study reviews various digital platforms, apps, and e-learning environments that support reading and writing instruction. It also highlights challenges and recommendations for integrating digital tools effectively in literacy education.

PDF

References

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

Hutchison, A., & Reinking, D. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of integrating ICT. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 312–333.

Leu, D. J., et al. (2013). The new literacies of online research. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 316–339.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Yusupova, S. (2025). Gender-based comparative analysis of respect in linguistic expression: a study of Uzbek, Japanese, English, and German. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2512789.

Yusupova, S. (2025). ECHOES OF DEFERENCE: PARALINGUISTIC CUES OF RESPECT IN SPOKEN INTERACTIONS AMONG UZBEK, JAPANESE, AND AMERICAN ENGLISH SPEAKERS. Modern Science and Research, 4(5), 766–776.

Yusupova, S. (2025). CROSS-CULTURAL EXPRESSIONS OF RESPECT IN LANGUAGE. Modern Science and Research, 4(5), 126–128.

Warschauer, M. (2007). The paradoxical future of digital learning. Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 41–49.

Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). Analyzing evidence of equity. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225.